Thursday, June 20, 2024

EXPANDED INSPECTION

 




Port State Control Officers (PSCO) with procedures how to carry out an initial, more detailed or expanded inspection.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/maritime-and-coastguard-agency-port-state-control-expanded-inspections

 

https://parismou.org/sites/default/files/PSCC54-2021-03%20Guidance%20on%20type%20of%20inspections.pdf


Application This guidance is applicable for all ships. On the following ships it is required to carry out an expanded inspection: 

Risk Ship Type (Oil Tanker, Bulk Carrier, Passenger Ship, Gas Carrier, Chemical Tanker and NLS tankers which are more than 12 years old) 

High Risk Ship


Relevant documentation Paris MoU manual (latest revision:  Reference should also be made to appropriate national / regional legislation.)

PSCC Instructions (PORT STATE CONTROL COMMITTEE INSTRUCTION)


INSPECTION OF SHIP 

Initial Inspection 

Initial inspection means a visit on board a ship by a PSCO, in order to check compliance with the relevant Conventions and regulation and verifies, where appropriate, whether outstanding deficiencies found during the previous inspections carried out have been rectified and satisfies himself of the overall condition of the ship.

Clear grounds 

In the absence of valid certificates or documents or after the establishment of clear grounds, the PSCO will: 

1. conduct a more detailed inspection in the area(s) where clear grounds were established; 

2. carry out a more detailed inspection in other areas at random; and 

3. include further checking of compliance with on board operational requirements by carrying out operational controls 

see PSCC Instruction Guidance on procedures for operational controls

According to Annex 9, Section 6 of the Memorandum the following are examples for clear grounds for a more detailed inspection:

1. the absence of principal equipment or arrangements required by the relevant conventions; 

2. evidence from a review of the ship's certificates that a certificate or certificates are clearly invalid; 

3. evidence that documentation required by the relevant conventions and listed in Annex 10 of the Memorandum is not on board, incomplete, not maintained or falsely maintained; 

4. evidence from the PSCO's general impressions and observations that serious hull or structural deterioration or deficiencies exist that may place at risk the structural, watertight or weathertight integrity of the ship; 

5. evidence from the PSCO's general impressions or observations that serious deficiencies exist in the safety, pollution prevention or navigational equipment; 

6. information or evidence that the master or crew is not familiar with essential shipboard operations relating to the safety of ships or the prevention of pollution, or that such operations have not been carried out; 

7. indications that key crew members may not be able to communicate with each other or with other persons on board; 

8. the emission of false distress alerts not followed by proper cancellation procedures; 

9. receipt of a report or complaint containing information that a ship appears to be substandard and; 

10. ships with overriding or unexpected factors as listed in Annex 8 (of the MoU).


More Detailed Inspection 

In the exercise of a more detailed inspection the PSCO will take into account: 

the provisions of this instruction; 

the provisions of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code; 

the provisions of the PSCC Instructions for PSCO’s and Annex 2 of the Memorandum, as appropriate.

 Guidance on areas not covered by specific PSCC Instructions:

Structure 

The PSCO’s impression of hull maintenance and the general state on deck, the condition of such items as ladder ways, guard-rails, pipe coverings and areas of corrosion or pitting will influence the PSCO's decision as to whether it is necessary to make the fullest possible examination of the structure with the ship afloat. Significant areas of damage or corrosion, or pitting of plating and associated stiffening in decks and hull affecting seaworthiness or strength to take local loads, may justify detention. It may be necessary for the underwater portion of the ship to be checked. In reaching a decision, the PSCO will have regard to the seaworthiness and not the age of the ship, making an allowance for fair wear and tear over the minimum acceptable scantlings. Damage not affecting seaworthiness will not constitute grounds for judging that a ship should be detained, nor will damage that has been temporarily but effectively repaired for a voyage to a port for permanent repairs. However, in this assessment of the effect of damage, the PSCO will have regard to the location of crew accommodation and whether the damage substantially affects its habitability.

The PSCO will pay particular attention to the structural integrity and seaworthiness of bulk carriers and oil tankers (IMO Resolution A.744(18) as amended). The PSCO's assessment of the safety of the structure of those ships will be based on the Survey Report File carried on board. This file should contain reports of structural surveys, condition evaluation reports (translated into English and endorsed by the flag State Administration), thickness measurement reports and a survey planning document. If the Survey Report File necessitates a more detailed inspection of the structure of the ship or if no such report is carried, special attention will be given by the PSCO, as appropriate, to hull structure, piping systems in way of cargo tanks or holds, pump-rooms, cofferdams, pipe tunnels, void spaces within the cargo area, and ballast tanks.

For bulk carriers, PSCO’s will inspect holds' main structure for any obviously unauthorized repairs. Where applicable, for bulk carriers the PSCO will verify that the bulk carrier booklet has been endorsed, that any restrictions imposed on the carriage of solid bulk cargoes have been recorded in the booklet, that the bulk carrier loading triangle is permanently marked and that water level alarms in cargo holds are fitted.

Machinery spaces

 The PSCO will assess the condition of the machinery and of the electrical installations such that they are capable of providing sufficient continuous power for propulsion and for auxiliary services. During inspection of the machinery spaces, the PSCO will form an impression of the standard of maintenance. Frayed or disconnected quickclosing valve wires, disconnected or inoperative extended control rods or machinery trip mechanisms, missing valve hand wheels, evidence of chronic steam, water and oil leaks, dirty tank tops and bilges or extensive corrosion of machinery foundations are pointers to an unsatisfactory organization of the systems' maintenance. A large number of temporary repairs, including pipe clips or cement boxes, will indicate reluctance to make permanent repairs. While it is not possible to determine the condition of the machinery without performance trials, general deficiencies, such as leaking pump glands, dirty water gauge glasses, inoperable pressure gauges, rusted relief valves, inoperative or disconnected safety or control devices, evidence of repeated operation of diesel engine scavenge belt or crankcase relief valves, malfunctioning or inoperative automatic equipment and alarm systems, and leaking boiler casings or uptakes, would warrant inspection of the engine room log book and investigation into the record of machinery failures and accidents and a request for running tests of machinery. If one electrical generator is out of commission, the PSCO will investigate whether power is available to maintain essential and emergency services and should conduct tests. If evidence of neglect becomes evident, the PSCO will extend the scope of an investigation to include, for example, tests on the main and auxiliary steering gear arrangements, overspeed trips, circuit breakers, etc. It must be stressed that while detection of one or more of the above deficiencies would afford guidance to a substandard condition, the actual combination is a matter for professional judgement in each case.

Conditions of assignment of load lines It may be that the PSCO has concluded that a hull inspection is unnecessary but, if dissatisfied on the basis of observations on deck, with items such as defective hatch closing arrangements, corroded air pipes and vent coamings, the PSCO will examine closely the conditions of assignment of load lines, paying particular attention to closing appliances, means of freeing water from the deck and arrangements concerned with the protection of the crew.

Life-saving appliances

The effectiveness of life-saving appliances depends heavily on good maintenance by the crew and their use in regular drills. The lapse of time since the last survey for a Safety Equipment Certificate can be a significant factor in the degree of deterioration of equipment if it has not been subject to regular inspection by the crew. Apart from failure to carry equipment required by a convention or obvious defects such as holed lifeboats, the PSCO will look for signs of disuse of, or obstructions to, survival craft launching equipment which may include paint accumulation, seizing of pivot points, absence of greasing, condition of blocks and falls and improper lashing or stowing of deck cargo. Should such signs be evident, the PSCO will be justified in making a detailed inspection of all life-saving appliances. Such an examination might include the lowering of survival craft, a check on the servicing of life rafts and any fitted marine evacuation system a check of means of recovery of survivors, the number and condition of life jackets and lifebuoys and ensuring that the pyrotechnics are still within their period of validity. It would not normally be as detailed as that for a renewal of the Safety Equipment Certificate and would concentrate on essentials for safe abandonment of the ship, but in an extreme case could progress to a full Safety Equipment Certificate inspection. The provision and functioning of effective overside lighting, means of alerting the crew and passengers and provision of illuminated routes to assembly points and embarkation positions will be given importance in the inspection.

Fire safety

 The poor condition of fire and wash deck lines and hydrants and the possible absence of fire hoses and extinguishers in accommodation spaces might be a guide to a need for a close inspection of all fire safety equipment. In addition to compliance with convention requirements, the PSCO will look for evidence of a higher than normal fire risk; this might be brought about by a poor standard of cleanliness in the machinery space, which together with significant deficiencies of fixed or portable fire-extinguishing equipment could lead to a judgement of the ship being substandard. The PSCO will examine the fire control plan on board in order to obtain a general picture of the fire safety measures provided in the ship and consider their compliance with convention requirements for the year of build. Queries on the method of structural protection will be addressed to the flag State Administration and the PSCO will generally confine the inspection to the effectiveness of the arrangements provided. The spread of fire could be accelerated if fire doors are not readily operable. The PSCO will inspect for the operability and securing arrangements of those doors in the main zone bulkheads and stairway enclosures and in boundaries of high fire risk spaces, such as main machinery rooms and galleys, giving particular attention to those retained in the open position. Attention will also be given to main vertical zones which may have been compromised through new construction. An additional hazard in the event of fire is the spread of smoke through ventilation systems. Spot checks might be made on dampers and smoke flaps to ascertain the standard of operability. The PSCO will also ensure that ventilation fans can be stopped from the master controls and that means are available for closing main inlets and outlets of ventilation systems. Attention will be given to the effectiveness of escape routes by ensuring that vital doors are not maintained locked and that alleyways and stairways are not obstructed.

Regulations for preventing collisions at sea A vital aspect of ensuring safety of life at sea is full compliance with the collision regulations. Based on observations on deck, the PSCO will consider the need for close inspection of lanterns and their screening and means of making sound and distress signals. 

Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate 

The general condition of the ship may lead the PSCO to consider matters other than those concerned with safety equipment and assignment of load lines, but nevertheless associated with the safety of the vessel, such as the effectiveness of items associated with the Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate, which can include pumping arrangements, means for shutting off air and oil supplies in the event of fire, alarm systems and emergency power supplies. 

Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificates

The validity of the Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificates and associated Record of Equipment (Form R) may be accepted as proof of the provision and effectiveness of its associated equipment, but the PSCO will ensure that appropriate certificated personnel are carried for its operation and for listening periods. Requirements for maintenance of radio equipment are contained in SOLAS. The radio log or radio records will be examined. Where considered necessary, operational checks may be carried out. 2.3.9 Equipment in excess of convention or flag State requirements Equipment on board which is expected to be relied on in situations affecting safety or pollution prevention must be in operating condition. If such equipment is inoperative and is in excess of the equipment required by an appropriate convention and/or the flag State, it should be repaired, removed or, if removal is not practicable, clearly marked as inoperative and secured.

Expanded Inspection

An expanded inspection shall include a check of the overall condition, including human element where relevant, in the following risk areas: 

1. Documentation 

2. Structural condition 

3. Water/Weathertight condition 

4. Emergency systems 

5. Radio communication 

6. Cargo operations 

7. Fire safety 

8. Alarms 

9. Living and working conditions 

10. Navigation equipment 

11. Life saving appliances 

12. Dangerous Goods 

13. Propulsion and auxiliary machinery 

14. Pollution prevention

and subject to their practical feasibility or any constraints relating to the safety of persons, the ship or the port, verification of the specific items in these risk areas as listed in Annex 1 of this instruction must be part of an expanded inspection. 

The PSCO must use professional judgement to determine the appropriate depth of examination or testing of each specific item. If, taking into account the table in Annex 2, the ship is certified for more than one type of ship, the scope of the expanded inspection should include the specific items of Annex 1 for each of the ship types (example: for an Oil/Chemical tanker the items under sections 

1. (for all ship types), 

3. (for chemical tanker) and 

5. (for oil tanker) has to be taken into consideration). 

The scope is determined by the applicable statutory certificates on board and not by the cargo carried at the time of inspection. PSCOs must be aware that it may jeopardise the safe execution of certain on-board operations, e.g. cargo handling, if tests having a direct effect thereon are required to be carried out during such operations. The inspection will take account of the human elements covered by ILO, ISM and STCW and include operational controls as appropriate.

Note: Specific items are not listed for all of the risk areas mentioned in Annex 1 of this instruction. For areas without specific items the PSCO must use professional judgement in deciding which items to inspect in order to check the overall condition in these areas.

Annex 1 

Specific items to be inspected during an expanded inspection 

1. All Ship Types 

o Structural condition 

 Condition of hull and deck 

o Water/Weathertight condition 

 watertight/weathertight doors 

 ventilators, air pipes and casing 

 hatchways 

o Emergency systems 

 Simulated black-out/start of emergency generator 

 Emergency lighting 

 Test of bilge pumping arrangements 

 Test of closing devices/ watertight doors 

 Test of steering gear incl. emergency steering gear

o Radio communication 

 Test of reserve source of energy 

 Test of main installation including facilities for reception of marine safety information 

 Test of GMDSS portable VHF sets

o Fire safety 

 Fire drill including a demonstration of the ability to use firemen's outfits and fire fighting equipment and appliances 

 Test of emergency fire pump (with 2 hoses) 

 Test of remote emergency stopping ventilation and associated dampers 

 Test of remote emergency stopping fuel pumps 

 Test of remote quick closing valves 

 Fire doors 

 Fixed fire extinguishing installations and associated alarms

 o Alarms 

 Test of the fire alarm o Living and working conditions 

 The seafarers’ employment agreement, 

 The fulfilment of requirements for hours of work or hours of rest, 

 The standard of accommodation, 

 The food and catering facilities, 

 The facilities for on board medical care 

 The risk evaluation, programmes, training and instruction, accident report and protective equipments. 

o Life saving appliances 

 Launching arrangements for survival and rescue craft (if evidence of disuse, craft to be lowered to the water) 

o Pollution prevention 

 Test of oil filtering equipment

2. Bulk carrier

 In addition to the items listed under 

1, the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for bulk carriers: 

o Documentation 

 Verification that the following documents are on board, complete and endorsed by the flag state or recognised organisation: 

• The enhanced survey programme (ESP) including: 

 Reports of structural survey 

 Thickness measurement reports 

 Condition evaluation reports 

 Check whether the cargo carried is allowed by the DoC for Dangerous Goods 

 Approval for loading instruments o Structural condition 

 Condition of bulkheads and coamings 

 Ballast tanks

• At least one of the ballast tanks within the cargo area to be examined from tank manhole/deck access or entered if the inspector establishes clear grounds based on observation and the ESP records.

3. Gas carrier, chemical tanker, NLS tanker (Noxious Liquid Substances)

In addition to the items listed under 1, 

the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for gas, chemical tankers and NLS tankers: 

o Documentation 

 Check whether the products carried are on the relevant International Certificate of Fitness (gas carriers and chemical tankers) or International Pollution Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk (NLS tankers) 

o Cargo operations 

 Cargo tank monitoring and safety devices relating to temperature, pressure and ullage 

 Oxygen analysing and explosimeter devices, including their calibration. Availability of chemical detection equipments (bellows) with an appropriate number of suitable gas detection tubes for the cargo carried 

 Test of deck shower (where applicable)

o Fire safety 

 Test of fixed fire fighting installations on deck (if required under the relevant Certificate) o Living and working condition 

 Cabin escape sets with respiratory and eye protection (if required by the products listed in the relevant Certificate)

4. General cargo, Container ship, Refrigerated cargo carrier, Factory ship, Heavy load carrier, Offshore service ship, Special purpose ship, MODU, FPSO, Other types of ship 

In addition to the items listed under 1, 

the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for the ship types of the section heading: 

o Watertight/Weathertight condition 

 Condition of hatch covers 

 Access to cargo holds/tanks 

o Cargo operations 

 Loading equipment 

 Lashing arrangements

5. Oil tanker 

In addition to the items listed under 1, 

the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for oil tankers: 

o Documentation 

 Verification that the following documents are on board, complete and endorsed by the flag state or recognised organisation: 

• The enhanced survey programme (ESP) including: 

 Reports of structural survey 

 Thickness measurement reports 

 Condition evaluation reports 

 Foam certificate for deck foam system 

o Structural condition 

 Ballast tanks

• At least one of the ballast tanks within the cargo area to be examined from tank manhole/deck access or entered if the inspector establishes clear grounds based on observation and the ESP records. 

o Fire safety 

 Fixed deck foam system 

 Control of pressure of inert gas and oxygen content thereof 

6. Passenger HSC, Passenger ship, Ro-Ro passenger ship

 In addition to the items listed under 1,

 the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for passenger ships: 

o Documentation 

 Documented evidence of: 

• Crowd-management training 

• Familiarisation training

• Safety training for personnel providing direct safety assistance to passengers in passenger spaces, and in particular to elderly and disabled persons in an emergency 

• Crisis management and human behaviour training 

o Watertight/Weathertight condition 

 Bow and stern doors as applicable 

 Test of remote and local controls of watertight bulkhead doors o Emergency systems 

 Crew familiarity with damage control plan 

o Cargo operations 

 Lashing arrangements as applicable o Fire safety 

 Test of remote and local controls for the closing of fire dampers o Alarms 

 Test of public address system 

 Test of fire detection and alarm system

o Life saving appliances 

 Abandon ship drill (including lowering a rescue and a life boat to the water) 

If deemed appropriate, the inspection may be continued while the ship is on passage to or from ports of member States with the consent of the master or the operator. PSCOs must not obstruct the operation of the ship or induce situations that, in the master's judgement, could endanger the safety of the passengers, the crew or the ship.

7. RO-RO CARGO SHIP

 In addition to the items listed under 1,

 the following items are to be considered as part of the expanded inspection for Ro-Ro cargo ships: 

o Water/Weathertight condition 

 Bow and stern doors 

o Cargo operations 

 Lashing arrangements

Ship type identification scheme for certain vessels liable for expanded inspection

Ship type

Identified on statutory certificates

Ship type confirmed by

Complying with

Designed to carry

Bulk carrier

Ship type mentioned on Safety Management Certificate

Marked on classification certificate as 'Bulk Carrier' and 'ESP'

Solas Ch XII

Solid bulk cargoes

Oil Tanker

- Ship type mentioned on Safety Management Certificate - Availability of “International Oil pollution prevention certificate” with supplement Part B

- Marked on classification certificate as 'Oil Tanker' and 'ESP' - Availability of “Oil record book Part II (oil tankers)”

Marpol Annex I

Oil products as per Marpol Annex I

Chemical Tanker

-Ship type mentioned on Safety Management Certificate - Availability of “International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk”

- Marked on classification certificate as 'Chemical tanker' - Availability of “Cargo record book for ships carrying Noxious Liquids in Bulk” and P&A manual (as per footnote (1))

Solas Ch. VII Reg. 10 - IBC code(BCH code for ships with keel date < 01.07.1986) and - Marpol Annex II as per footnote (1)

products under IBC code Ch. 17 and Ch. 18 (see footnote (1)), as specified on the“International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk” and its appendices

Gas Carrier

-Ship type mentioned on Safety Management Certificate

 - Availability of “International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk”

Marked on classification certificate as 'Gas Carrier'

Solas Ch. VII reg. 13 - IGC code(GC codefor ships with keel date < 01.07.1986)

any liquefied gas in bulk or other products listed in chapter 19 of the IGC code, as specified on the “International Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Liquefied Gases in Bulk” and its appendices)

NLS tanker (Noxious liquid substances)

Availability of “International Pollution Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk”

- Marked on classification certificate as 'NLS tanker' or 'NLS' notation - Availability of “Cargo record book for ships carrying Noxious Liquids in Bulk” and P&A manual

Marpol Annex II and IBC code chapter 18

products categorised as X,Y, Z (OS) only under IBC code chapter 18, as specified on the “International Pollution Prevention Certificate for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk” and its appendices

Combination Carrier (including OBO)

documents as above for both Bulk Carrier and Oil tanker

see above for both types

see above for both types

see above for both types

Oil tanker/Chemical tanker

documents as above for both Oil tanker and Chemical tanker

see above for both types

see above for both types

see above for both types

Oil tanker/NLS tanker (see footnote (2) and (3) and (4)

documents as above for both Oil tanker and NLS tanker

see above for both types

see above for both types

see above for both types

Oil tanker/Gas Carrier (see footnote (2))

documents as above for both Oil tanker and Gas Carrier

see above for both types

see above for both types

see above for both types

Gas Carrier/NLS Tanker

documents as above for both Gas Carrier and NLS tanker

see above for both types

see above for both types

see above for both types


Wednesday, June 19, 2024

X1002 Port State Control inspection for Bulk Carrier

Port State Control inspection for  Bulk Carrier


If you are aboard a bulk carrier, you may encounter inspections from two different perspectives. One of these involves being inspected by the Port State Control.


More detailed inspection of the bulk carrier mostly focuses on the structural parts of the bulk carrier.

Procedures for more detailed inspection of ship structural requirements.

1 - PSCO’s impression of hull maintenance and the general state on deck, the condition of deck fittings and areas of corrosion or pitting, influence the PSCO’s decision.
2 - Significant areas of damage or corrosion, or pitting of plating and associated stiffening affecting seaworthiness may be a ground for detention. It may be requested to check underwater part.
3 - PSCO will pay particular attention to the structural integrity and seaworthiness of Bulk Carriers.
4 - PSCO’s assessment of the structure of Bulk Carriers is based on the Survey Report File (ESP File) carried on board. This file contains:- Reports of structural surveys,- Structure Condition Evaluation Report,- Thickness Measurement Reports,- ESP PlanningThe lack on board of the ESP File is normally considered as a PSC deficiency / ground for detention.
5 – Based on the examination of the ESP file (or if no ESP file is on board), a more detailed inspection of the structure may be performed by PSCO, who will inspect the hull structure, piping system, holds, cofferdams, pipe tunnels, void spaces, cargo space, ballast tanks, etc.
6 - PSCO inspects holds’ main structure for any obviously unauthorized repairs.
7 - If applicable, bulk carrier booklet will be verified by PSCO to confirm whether is endorsed for any restriction imposed for carriage of solid bulk cargoes and for loading triangle permanent marking.
8 - PSCO checks that water level alarms in cargo hold are fitted.

In case PSCo has to do the ‘expanded inspection’ of Bulk Carriers, below items are the areas to be paid attention as the PSC keen on these areas on a bulk carrier.

Procedures for expanded inspection of Bulk Carriers

1 - Closing of the watertight doors.



2 - Possible corrosion of deck machinery foundations.


3 - Possible deformation and/or corrosion of hatch covers.


4 - Possible cracks or local corrosion in transverse bulkheads.


5 – Access to the cargo holds.



6 - Verification that the ESP file contains the relevant documents endorsed by the Classification Society.
 https://bulkcarrierguide.com/structural-problems.html

2022 Paris MoU Annual Report



Bulk Carrier is at the top of the list



USCG PSC Annual Report


Bulk carriers that have been detained in recent years, based on Port State Control (PSC) records, can be examined as follows:

The following deficiencies have been found and considered as ground for detention by the PSCO on Bulk Carriers:ESP FILE MISSING:- Thickness survey measurement survey report.- Structural Condition Evaluation Report.- ESP Planning.TOP SIDE WB TANKS:- Bulkheads between TSWB Tanks were found cracked and perforated.- The web frames, brackets, floors in TSWB Tanks were found corroded, holed and cracked.- Numerous worn out anodes were found in the TSWB Tanks.AFT PEAK TANK:- Engine Room Aft Bulkhead was found corroded and perforated.- Aft Peak found heavy rusted and corroded, 1st platform found corroded and holed.HATCH COVERS AND HATCH COAMINGS:- Hatch end beam wasted.- Hatch covers damaged.- Cracks on the hatch covers.- Several hatch covers closing devices (cleats) were in poor condition.- Hatch coaming brackets wasted and cracked.- Hatch girder plates were found cracked.CARGO HOLDS- Lower stools in cargo hold - bolts and nuts missing on covers.- Cargo hold side shell frames’ brackets damaged and distorted.- Cargo hold hatch opening radius corner fractured.

Note:    ESP FlLEThe owner is to supply and maintain an ESP file containing the following documentation (kept for the life time of the ship).A survey report file:- Reports of structural surveys- Hull Condition Evaluation Report- Thickness Measurement Reports & other info which may identify suspect areas- ESP Survey PlanThe following additional documents is to be made available on board:- Main structural plans of cargo holds and ballast tanks- Previous repair history- Cargo & Ballast history- Ship’s personnel reports on: structural deterioration/defects, leakage on the bulkheads & piping system, condition of coating or corrosion prevention system- Other info that may help to identify suspect & critical structural areas.







Does a Flag State authority need to make audits to the ship who classified by the IACS members?

Yes, flag state authorities typically conduct audits and inspections of ships that fly their flag, regardless of whether the ship has been classified by an IACS (International Association of Classification Societies) member. Classification societies play a crucial role in ensuring that ships are designed, constructed, and maintained in compliance with international regulations and standards. They provide classification services, such as surveys and inspections, to verify that a ship meets certain safety and quality standards.

However, flag state authorities have the ultimate responsibility for enforcing regulations and ensuring that ships under their flag comply with international conventions and national laws. They may conduct their own audits and inspections to verify the ship's compliance with safety, environmental, and operational requirements.

In practice, there is often a collaborative relationship between classification societies and flag state authorities. Classification societies are recognized as organizations with the expertise to assess and verify compliance with certain technical standards. Flag state authorities may rely on the work of classification societies to some extent but will also carry out their own audits and inspections to ensure the overall safety and regulatory compliance of the vessels under their jurisdiction.


For example, the ship is placed on Technical Monitoring and on the list for Vertical Technical Audit to be carried.

VTA findings

The auditor's List of Findings identified 43 deficiencies, of which many were of a serious nature.Extracts from auditor's report:"condition of deck and cargo areas of the vessel reflects an almost total lack of maintenance""it is quite clear that the SMS is not functioning in any meaningful way"
Sample of the most serious findings:Various hatch pontoons found with cross-joint seal channels fracturedLongitudinal coaming stays at the forward corners of hatch No. 4 found crackedAll 4 steering gear rams found leaking at seals under "no-load condition"Secondary means of starting for the emergency fire pump found seizedQuick-closing valve found blocked in open position and unable to closeForepeak mid and upper levels requiring major repairsCargo holds appear heavily scaled. The hatch main beams are visibly damaged & corroded around the lightening holes.





Root Cause Analysis

Why was the vessel detained less than three months after the class renewal surveys were completed ?Why was the vessel in such a substandard condition?

  • BV procedures/instructions not followed by attending surveyors
  • Lack of preparation for the surveys
  • Means of access not provided
  • Repair works not properly done
  • Lack of supervision during survey
  • Lack of maintenance after the surveys
  • Each of the above factors have been analysed to ascertain their contribution to the substandard condition of the ship

Root cause analysis - Several factors may have contributed to the detention:

Another example:

The ship is detained at Cardiff, UK. Following identification of structural defects on Cargo Hatch cleat brackets severely wasted, ship maintenance and equipment. Visit of EMSA onboard and VTA carried out at Cardiff, UK. Significant number of technical deficiencies identified throughout the vessel. Detention was considered as class related.

 Following e-mail received from MCA.

Thank you for your survey report received yesterday. To date 183 new cleat brackets have been fitted following the detention. From what the ships crew tell me these new cleat brackets were placed onboard during dry dock January The point of the Class responsibility is that these long term deficiencies should have been rectified before the vessel sailed, and were not. We cannot accept that they were placed onboard for the crew to carry out during operations, given the extensive wastage which had greatly reduced their securing ability.

VTA findings

The auditor's List of Findings identified 103 deficiencies, of which many were of a serious natureRepresentative photographs are shown in next slides"Sample of the most serious findings:All ER fan housing intake louvres to repair.Corrosion to external bulkhead of oxygen room to be repairedCorroded areas of hatch cover stiffening to definitively repaired.All hatch cover stiffening to be ultrasonically thickness gauged and repaired as required.All hold access house vent louvres to be repaired.All hatch coaming face plates to be de-scaled, ultrasonically thickness gauged and repaired as required.All hatch cover closing stops to be de-scaled and repaired as required.All DB ballast tanks adjacent to fuel tanks to be de-scaled, ultrasonically gauged and repaired in area 1m from fuel tank bulkhead.



When a flag state authority conducts an audit and identifies findings on a ship that has been previously surveyed by class surveyors, the consequences can vary depending on the nature and severity of the findings. Here are some possible consequences:

Issuance of Non-Conformities or Deficiencies:

The flag state authority may issue non-conformities or deficiencies based on the audit findings. These could relate to various aspects, such as safety equipment, structural integrity, environmental compliance, or operational procedures.

Correction and Rectification Period:

The ship's owner or operator will typically be given a specific period to address and rectify the identified issues. This corrective action period is determined by the severity of the findings and the potential impact on safety and compliance.

Follow-up Inspections:

The flag state authority may conduct follow-up inspections to verify that the identified non-conformities or deficiencies have been addressed satisfactorily. This is to ensure that the necessary corrective actions have been taken and that the ship now complies with the required standards.

Withholding of Certificates:

In more serious cases or if the identified issues pose an immediate threat to safety, the flag state authority may have the authority to withhold or suspend certificates until the necessary corrective measures are implemented.

Penalties and Sanctions:

Flag state authorities have the power to impose penalties or sanctions for non-compliance. These may include fines, detention of the ship, or even suspension or withdrawal of the ship's registration.

Communication with Classification Society:

The flag state authority may communicate its findings and concerns to the classification society that performed the initial surveys. This communication can lead to a review of the classification society's procedures and may impact its standing with the flag state.

It's important to note that the consequences will be determined based on the specific regulations and laws of the flag state, as well as the severity of the non-conformities found during the audit. The goal is to ensure that ships comply with international regulations, maintain safety standards, and operate in an environmentally responsible manner.


Please attempt the quiz in below link:


EXPANDED INSPECTION

  Port State Control Officers (PSCO) with procedures how to carry out an initial, more detailed or expanded inspection. https://www.gov.uk/g...